For most of us, articleship was where we learned the job by doing the repetitive parts: vouching, ticking, preparing schedules, chasing documents. A lot of that preparation can now be drafted by a tool in minutes. If firms keep training article assistants the old way, they will produce juniors who are good at work that is disappearing and untrained in the work that remains.

The time available has also shrunk. Under ICAI’s New Scheme of Education and Training, practical training is two years, so firms have less time to get it right. This is how I would redesign those two years, with the regulatory facts first and my practice view clearly marked as such.

The training window under the new scheme

According to ICAI’s FAQs on the New Scheme of Education and Training, practical training starts after a student passes both groups of the Intermediate examination and completes the four-week ICITSS course, and lasts two years. Industrial training of 9 to 12 months is permitted in the last part of those two years, and 12 leaves are allowed in each year. The four-week Advanced ICITSS course comes after practical training and before the Final examination.

Two years, minus leave and exam preparation, is not much time to turn a student into someone a partner can rely on. That argues for being deliberate about what articles spend their hours on.

The scheme in numbers

The figures below are all from ICAI’s own FAQs. They matter for planning because they fix how much of a student’s time is actually available to the firm.

Key timings under ICAI’s New Scheme of Education and Training. Source: ICAI Board of Studies FAQs.
ItemWhat the scheme saysWhy it matters to the firm
Start of practical trainingAfter passing both Intermediate groups and completing four-week ICITSSArticles arrive with basic IT and soft-skills training already done
DurationTwo yearsPlan the curriculum in quarters, not as an open-ended apprenticeship
Leave12 leaves in each yearRoughly 24 days across the term; schedule the manual fundamentals early
Industrial training9 to 12 months, in the last part of the two yearsSome articles leave for industry before the busy season you planned around
Final exam eligibilityPractical training completed six months before the first day of the exam monthExpect exam leave and reduced availability late in the term
Advanced ICITSSFour weeks, after practical training, before the FinalNot part of the firm’s two years
Self-paced online modulesFour sets (A to D); pass mark 50% per moduleSET D includes Digital Ecosystem and Controls, a natural link to firm tool policies

The profession is already moving

ICAI has been unusually quick on AI. At its AI Innovation Summit 2026, the Institute said it had trained over 50,000 members in AI and developed more than 150 GPT-based tools, and it launched Level 3 of its AI certificate course for members. Students have their own tools too: ICAI’s November 2024 release reported a GPT for CA students covering Foundation, Intermediate and Final, with over 50,000 students using it at the time.

So articles will arrive already using AI. The firm’s job is not to introduce the tools; it is to teach professional habits around them.

Teach review before preparation

The most valuable skill a junior can build now is checking machine output against evidence. I would restructure the first months of articleship around that.

  • Give articles AI-drafted schedules with deliberate errors planted, and assess how many they find and how they prove each one.
  • Make “show me the source document” the default response to any number an article presents, whoever or whatever produced it.
  • Have articles write the review note on an AI draft, not just correct it, so the reasoning is visible.
  • Rotate them through exception handling: the items a reconciliation tool could not match are where judgement is learned.

Keep the fundamentals manual for a while

There is a real risk of juniors who can operate a tool but cannot do the underlying work. I would keep a short period of fully manual work on core tasks, such as a bank reconciliation, a GST return working and a set of audit vouching, before introducing AI on the same task. You cannot review what you have never done.

The internal audit standards make a similar point for the whole team. ICAI’s SIA 240 on use of tools requires that the team has the competencies to use selected tools and that the engagement lead ensures periodic training as tools evolve. The same principle applies in any practice.

A two-year plan, quarter by quarter

This is the structure I would use. It is a practice suggestion, not an ICAI requirement, and it assumes a mixed audit and tax practice.

  • Quarter 1: manual fundamentals. Bank reconciliation, vouching, a GST return working and a TDS working done by hand, reviewed line by line.
  • Quarter 2: review of machine output. The same tasks, now with AI-drafted versions containing planted errors; the article writes the review note.
  • Quarters 3 and 4: evidence-heavy audit work, such as the clause-by-clause evidence index for CARO and the tax audit report, where tools prepare and articles check.
  • Quarters 5 and 6: exception handling and client conversations. Unmatched items, notice replies and queries to management, with a senior present.
  • Quarters 7 and 8: mentoring juniors and, for those leaving for industrial training, a handover file that shows their review notes.

What to teach on real engagements

Two engagement types work especially well for this. In statutory audit, CARO reporting is mostly evidence assembly followed by a judgement, which makes it ideal for teaching the line between the two; I walk through it clause by clause in AI for CARO 2020 reporting. For working papers generally, AI for audit working papers in India covers what SA 230 still demands of the file whoever drafted it.

On the tax side, AI for tax audit in India is a good second-year assignment: lots of data matching, and a clear point where a CA has to sign. If articles move faster because of tools, the firm also has to think about how that shows up in fees, which I discuss in how CA firms should price work when AI cuts the hours.

Rules articles should know on day one

None of this needs a large programme. A one-page policy, a planted-error exercise in the first month, and partners who ask “how do you know?” consistently will do more than any course. If you are weighing formal courses for the team, I compared the options in AI courses for chartered accountants in India. For the firm-wide plan, start from the AI for Chartered Accountants in India hub.

  • Which AI tools are approved, and that client data never goes into personal accounts.
  • What may be drafted by AI, and what must be done or concluded by a person.
  • That every AI-assisted output is labelled as such in the file until reviewed.
  • Who to ask when an AI answer and their own work disagree, and that disagreement is worth raising.

How to tell whether it is working

Measure the habit, not the tool. At the end of each quarter I would look at three things for every article: the share of planted errors they found, whether their review notes cite a source document for each point, and how many exceptions they escalated rather than cleared on their own. If those numbers improve, the training is working, whatever tools they used along the way.

A firm that wants to try this formally can treat the first cohort as a pilot, with a baseline and a go or stop decision at the end, using the approach in how to run a 90-day AI pilot in a CA firm.

Frequently asked questions

How long is CA articleship now?

Under ICAI’s New Scheme of Education and Training, practical training is two years, started after passing both groups of the Intermediate examination and completing ICITSS. Industrial training of 9 to 12 months is permitted in the last part.

How many leaves are allowed during articleship?

ICAI’s FAQs on the new scheme allow 12 leaves in each year of the two-year practical training.

Should article assistants use AI?

Yes, within firm rules on approved tools and client data, and after they have done the core tasks manually at least once. The priority is teaching them to review AI output against evidence.

What AI training does ICAI offer?

ICAI runs an AI certificate course for members, with Level 3 launched at its AI Innovation Summit 2026, and provides CA GPT tools for members and students. It reported training over 50,000 members in AI by June 2026.

What skills matter most for juniors now?

Checking outputs against source documents, writing clear review notes, handling exceptions and knowing when to escalate. Preparation still matters, but review is where trust is built.

When can a student sit the CA Final under the new scheme?

According to ICAI’s FAQs, after registering for the Final, completing practical training six months before the first day of the exam month, completing Advanced ICITSS and qualifying all four self-paced online modules.

Related reading

Sources

Disclaimer: this article is general educational commentary. It is not legal, tax, audit or data-protection advice and does not create an adviser–client relationship. Laws, standards and thresholds change; check the current official text and take professional advice on your facts before acting.